Monday, June 24, 2013

Second Sunday after Pentecost: The Danger of the Center


1 Kings 8:22-23, 41-43
Psalm 96:1-9
Galatians 1:1-12
Luke 7:1-10

The writer of Luke seems particularly interested in the theme of the outsider; the ones who do not quite fit into the system of their time and place; those on the margin, for whom the structures of society were not created, and who hence live on its edges.  This motif of the outsider is there from the very beginning of the Gospel of Luke.  At a time and place when a woman unable to conceive was not only pitied but slightly suspect, the writer begins the story with a barren woman, Elizabeth, the cousin of our Lady.  The angels carry the message of the Messiah’s birth first to shepherds, the lowest of the low in the ancient near-east. They lived as wanderers; both literally and metaphorically at the edges of society.  Only in Luke do we have the story of the Prodigal Son, who goes beyond the pale of what is considered proper parental love and respect, and who is nevertheless ultimately welcomed in from the cold.  Also, only in Luke, is there the story of Good Samaritan.  The Samaritans were a people hated, mis-trusted and vilified for their religious beliefs by Jesus’ contemporaries, yet it is only a Samaritan in the parable who exemplifies Jesus’ definition of neighbor.  Even at Jesus’ death, Luke depicts him as embracing the outcast, as he reassures the thief crucified with him, “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in Paradise.” (Luke 23:44)  And at the resurrection, it is the women to whom is entrusted its message and who bear witness to it in the midst of the other disciples.  All this in a world in which women’s testimony was not generally admissible as evidence in court.  In each instance, a deeper knowledge of God, or of God’s Good News, is made clear due to an encounter with, or the action of, an outsider.  The message is clear: it is the outsider – the maginalized, the stranger, the foreigner – who may very well have a better grasp on that to which God actually calls us.

The story of the centurion is perhaps the story in Luke which most powerfully exemplifies this theme.  The centurion represents the hated Romans.  He is not only a foreigner, but instrumental in the foreign occupation of Judea.  Indeed his sole purpose there is to maintain the occupation peacefully, and to punish by any means available whoever would seek to disrupt it.  Moreover, if recent biblical research reads the story correctly, the servant for whom he pleads and who was very dear to him, is actually his lover.  And while certainly – as Luke tells the story – this man had gained the respect of some of the Jewish elders, his personal life represents a practice and way of life abhorrent to mainstream, contemporary Jewish sensibilities.  Still, Jesus commends his faith over that of those at the religious center of his world:  “I tell you, not even in Israel have I found such faith.” (Luke 7:11) Jesus doesn’t judge him for being a foreigner or a fornicator, but rather praises him and raises him up as a model for those around him.

But why this concern – even obsession – in Luke (and I would argue in the Scriptures over-all) with the outsider?  The theologian Jane Kopas describes it like this, “[outsiders] see the world differently…[t]hey learn to think from two perspectives and  to speak two languages….Insiders, on the other hand, do not need any language other than their own because it gets them all they need.”  This is basic sociology, even anthropology, but it is also profoundly theological, because when live at the center of our society by virtue of our color, gender, sexual orientation, status or wealth we are all too often blinded when it comes to seeing the larger picture.  At the center, we are inclined to define God and God’s will in terms only of our world view, and because theology is wriiten by the dominant culture, we usally get away with it.  The voices and experiences of the outsider may at best be forgotten, at worst persecuted and condemned; and even a cursory review of history, including church history, is a dismal witness to both.  Yet, what the Gospel of Jesus – who was himself an outsider – tells us is that the voice of the outsider, may actually be the voice of God calling us to a more faithful living of the Good News.  Moreover, that when we live at the center of things – socially, economically, or in any other way – we miss something of God’s voice, we miss something of God’s vision, because – if we can trust Scripture in this regard – God seems to be almost consistently working out his purposes in and through the outsider.  Let’s face it, if one lives at the center of things, if one is, say, affluent, white, male, straight, life is made for you.  This doesn’t mean that it won’t have its difficulties, but at the center one has the financial, social and even political wherewhithal to meet those difficulties more-or-less effectively; for the most part, one has the power to effect the change deemed necesarry in order to return conditions to the status quo.  On the other hand, for those on the margins of society, for those who are outsiders by virtue of any number of circumstances, for those without resources or power to effect a change – well, they must abandon themselves to providence more immediately, and depend on God’s goodness more directly.  Remember the story of the widow’s mite (which not coincidentally appears only in Luke as well)?  She offers to God all that she has trusting solely in his providence, while the rich – those as the center – make their offering simply out of their abundance. (cf. luke 21:1-4) 

Still, the ironic aspect of at-the-center living, is that the center for all its seeming safety is a rather precarious place.  We can go from being at the center in any number of ways to finding ourselves very easily and quickly in a situation from which our cenralized position cannot save us.  We can go from being at the center in terms of our health, for example, to finding ourselves at the margins of life in hospital.  We can go all too quickly from the center of family life surrounded by friends and loved ones, to mourning a death at the emotional boundaries of existence.  The last few years have showed us this situation over and again.  How many went from sitting safely at the center of financial security, to grappling at edge with unemployment and economic chaos?  More recently, we have seen this dynamic poignantly and graphically displayed in the natural disasters in our country.  How many were just weeks ago living at the center of things socially and geographically but have since then been violently transported to the edges among the debris of what was once their security?  In these cases, the cry almost instinctively rises to God, because a situation has arisen which the safety and self-satisfaction of the center cannot fix.  Now, they must learn to live on the edge and abandon themselves to providence, because the systems of center-life are non-existent.  Yet, at the edge we find God’s goodness revealed in a myriad of ways – in the people who offer help, in the survival of our loved ones even when the rest our world seems to have perished, in the knowledge of being loved by friend when we feel most unlovable and a failure.  At the edges we can learn how nonsensical and ridiculous were the things we valued at the center, and we can readjust our priorities.  The edge opens our eyes to see things from a wider perspective, with keener insght, to discern who we are and who others are, stripped of social markers; that is, who we are, who they are, in God.

Perhaps, in the end it’s not that God lives on the edges, but that those on the edges are simply more attentive to his presence, more keen for the saving knowledge of his Good News.  They are more aware of their absolute need for him.  It is important that those of us at the center, pay close attention to this, because no matter where we are now at some point we will find ourselves at the edges; and even if we never do, looking at the world from an edge-perspective – as best we can – will grant to us a wider of field of vision as well as a more compassionate heart.  The fact is that we can stay at the center, but that position may very well shield us from the very thing as Christians we say we want – to grow closer to God and closer to our neighbor.  And let this be a gentle warning to us all, it was those at the center in Jesus’ day who were least likely to be transformed by his message of love, forgiveness and compassion.  After all they had – socially, politically, economically – the most to lose.     

No comments:

Post a Comment